Conflict Fantasies

My friend has an exercise called “conflict fantasies” in which she has an imaginary conflict with someone. It can be with someone you know, an imaginary person, or a real person you don’t know personally. My mom does this, too, she calls them “fantasy conversations” which broadens things a bit- they don’t have to be all about conflict, they can just be an imaginary conversation with someone.

Sometimes they just come up out of the blue. Usually they are about something in your life that inspires an emotional reaction and it is a way of working the conflict out in your head. Also they are inspired by real conversations you have with people about something or a real conflict and you want to continue the conflict or resolve it in some way- usually by coming up with the perfect argument, the perfect statement.

I do this a lot with my patients- I’ll review my day’s work and come up with all kinds of things I could have, should have, or wish I would have said.

Yesterday and the day before I did something called ATLS (Advanced Trauma Life Support). Two twelve-hour days where we learned about taking care of trauma patients. We hung out with all of these surgeons (who were wearing really nice SUITS which was weird) and practiced putting in chest tubes and central lines on these weird plastic dummies with these blood reservoirs so they bled. Turns out that two years ago these procedures were all practiced on anesthetized animals (pigs, goats, or dogs) who were then euthanized afterwards. THE HORROR!!!!!!

Anyways thankfully I didn’t have to deal with that- it was fun, exhausting, wacky, nerve-inducing and provoked a fair amount of existential anxiety. Spending the majority of my waking hours for two days straight contemplating the ways in which human bodies can be mangled and destroyed was unsettling.

I’ve got my card now, I am certified by the American College of Surgeons in Advanced Trauma Life Support. I’m ready to go to Enterprise, Oregon (population around 1600) and work in a 33 bed hospital staffed by three family practice doctors. Since its the only hospital in the county and there’s tons of agriculture, ranching etc. you end up seeing a fair amount of trauma- usually human vs cow or tractor.

During the day I started chatting with a family practice doc who works in an ER here in Oregon. Her town is consistently ranked the number one bike-friendliest in the country. I think that these rankings are neat and all but I don’t think there is any town in our country which does, in fact, really provide equality between cyclists and drivers. So- she starts up a friendly little conversation:

her: “I notice you carry panniers- do you bike everywhere?”

me: “Why, yes, I do.”

her: “Cool. You know, I noticed when I moved to Eugene that the cyclists there are pretty militant. They do that thing, you know- Critical something?”

me (wearing jacket with critical mass patch): Critical mass.

her: yeah, and they tend to ride pretty erratically- it can be hard when you drive a car sometimes. Sometimes they don’t even stop at stopsigns!

me: launching into a very familiar, defensive monologue about the car vs bike power dynamic and about how sometimes it isn’t safe for cyclists to obey car rules and how car rules are for cars and blah blah blah

her: something like well maybe “those cyclists” just are the exceptions and most cyclists are law-abiding and don’t get in the way.

then she exits for a bathroom break.

OHHHHHHHHH! By then my heartrate was up, my face was flushed and I was MAD MAD MAD.

I could spend my time here talking all about those issues and supplying you with informative links, etc. I’ll do that later. But today I’m talking about conflict fantasies and here’s how I would have liked that interaction to go (with loving props to my dear whippersnapper, husband).

Her: So, do you cycle everywhere?

Me: Yes.

Her: blah blah blah- militant cyclists, critical mass?

Me: Oh, so cyclists are militant in eugene? GOOD FOR THEM. When I’m driving in my car I am appreciative of cyclists who hold me accountable for the privilege of driving a humongous, dangerous, life-threatening, machine. Gosh, after these past two days of slides showing vehicular trauma, I think more people should be militant about reducing the dangerous consequences of car-culture.

Her: Excuse me, I have to go to the bathroom.

5 Responses

  1. Amanda Says:

    Also, on the first day of the training I got tsk tsked by a cop at a red light. “YOU NEED A LIGHT ON THAT BIKE!” He said, as my humongous reallite anemically flashed after being inadvertently on all day. It was not a friendly- “Hi, did you notice your batteries were dead? Its so much safer to ride if you are more visible.” It was an admonishment: “BAD BAD BAD, cyclist.”

    I felt like saying- “But I’m a doctor! And I spent all day learning about trauma! My batteries are just dead!” But that would have been weird.

  2. Esme Says:

    I’m still stunned that they had people training on live creatures so recently.

    Police people get trained to be like that. I wish you could have said what you wanted to, but it might not have permeated the surface. Probably best not to talk to cops if you don’t need to, I guess.
    Dennis got ticketed for not having brakes on a fixed-gear in SF over the summer. I’m a little conflicted about the issue. I think it should be a choice, I think I think that. I know people who have exquisite control on brake-less fixies, and also that it would be easy to argue in the aftermath of an accident that a cyclist without brakes was at fault no matter what the actions of the motorist were. I know that I asked my spouseling to put brakes on his fixed-gear. And yet the naked fixed-gear ridden with style and grace is just about the sexiest, most joyous thing on wheels if not the planet. And I don’t think that should merit a fix-it ticket.

  3. Esme Says:

    OOoooooo and then I got to the other bit. I like this conflict fantasy thing. Never fear, this conversation will happen again and you’ll be ready. More and more I find meditation practice is helpful for the conversations that touch on deeply held beliefs and emotions. If I can watch the Aaaaahhh! It’s all so unjust and wrong! And you’re blind to it! experience as it emerges I can sometimes stay with the other party and what they’re saying,because I don’t have to defend my deeply held belief/self/worldview. But I’m only just discovering that possibility and haven’t got to practice it much. There’s a possum with a mallet under my house again. Got to start the Disposable Heroes disk again. Love, Esme

  4. Anonymous Says:

    all i have to say, miss riss, is that i miss you…i miss hearing your voice and miss having these fantasy conversations with you….love, love, love melski

  5. kirsten Says:

    hey there.

    love the conflict conversation. glad yous guys are blogging again.

    tata, k

Leave a Comment